Reducing the Shortage of Special Education Teachers Networked Improvement Community
Through the support of the CEEDAR Center, AACTE has launched a Reducing the Shortage of Special Education Teachers Networked Improvement Community. You can learn more about NICs from the Carnegie Foundation’s web site.
This NIC aims to address the problem of the shortage and lack of diversity of fully prepared and credentialed special education teachers in public schools across the nation. Ten preparation programs in higher education have been selected to participate in this NIC and implement a range of strategies which will positively impact the special education teacher shortage by the Fall of 2022.
AACTE is proud to be partnering with the following institutions in reducing the special education teacher shortage:
- Cleveland State University
- Eastern Michigan University
- Texas State University
- University of Central Florida
- University of Nebraska at Omaha
- University of Northern Colorado
- University of Oregon
- University of Wisconsin at Madison
- Virginia State University
- Western Kentucky University
The Need for Improvement
The most significant impact of the special education teaching shortage is the resulting curtailed access to learning for students with disabilities. Multiple research studies indicate that fully prepared teachers in special education are more effective than those who are not fully prepared and are more likely to remain in teaching than those prepared in fast-track routes. Special education teachers with more extensive pedagogical preparation and practice teaching are better prepared to handle teaching duties such as managing the classroom environment and using a variety of instructional methods.
Phase I: This phase will encompass two years and engage our 10 preparation programs drawn from the AACTE membership. The aim of phase one is to identify a range of best practices in place, or in conception, which are or will address the shortage of special education teachers and the lack of diversity in the field. The participating programs represent a range of strategies, a range of types of institutions, and geographic diversity.
Phase II: Phase II will encompass the second two years of the project. It will include the original 10 institutions as they engage in data collection, research and analysis to examine and document the impact of the strategies including the outcomes produced.